A SLAPP, which stands for “Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation,” refers to a type of legal action that is often filed by one party against another with the intention of silencing or intimidating critics and suppressing public participation.
SLAPP lawsuits are typically used against individuals, activists, community groups, or organisations that express opinions or engage in activities that the plaintiff finds objectionable.
The primary aim of a SLAPP suit is not necessarily to win the legal case but to burden the defendant with the costs and stresses of a legal defense, thereby discouraging them from continuing their public activities or criticisms.
SLAPPs are often associated with issues of free speech, civic engagement, and the right to petition the government.
Who is targeted by SLAPPs?
Environmental Activists: Those who speak out against environmental degradation, pollution, or unsustainable practices may be targeted by corporations or industries seeking to suppress opposition to their activities.
Community Advocates: Local residents and community groups opposing development projects, land use changes, or other initiatives may face SLAPP suits from developers or entities with vested interests.
Consumer Advocacy Groups: Organizations or individuals advocating for consumer rights, product safety, or fair business practices may be targeted by companies seeking to silence criticism.
Whistleblowers: Individuals who expose corruption, misconduct, or illegal activities, especially within government agencies or private corporations, may face SLAPP suits as a means of retaliation.
Political Activists: Those involved in political activism, whether advocating for policy changes, government accountability, or social justice, may be targeted by government officials or powerful individuals seeking to suppress dissent.
Academics and Researchers: Scholars who publish research or findings that challenge powerful interests may face legal action in an attempt to silence their work or prevent the dissemination of information.
Online Critics: Individuals who express critical opinions on social media or online platforms may be subject to defamation lawsuits, particularly if their comments gain attention and potentially harm someone’s reputation.
Human Rights Advocates: Individuals or organizations working to expose human rights abuses, discrimination, or social injustices may face legal action aimed at stifling their efforts.
Measures to stop SLAPPs
To counteract the negative impact of SLAPP suits, some jurisdictions have enacted anti-SLAPP laws. These laws provide mechanisms for defendants to seek early dismissal of lawsuits that are deemed to be SLAPPs, and they may also allow the defendant to recover legal fees.
Anti-SLAPP laws are designed to protect free speech, civic engagement, and the right to petition the government from misuse of the legal system to stifle public discourse.
Anti-SLAPP: EU protection against legal actions that silence critical voices
In the UK: New plans to stop journalists being silenced by baseless lawsuits
New EU law could protect journalists and activists against legal bullying
There have been a few attempts in passing Anti-SLAPP legislation in Australia, but only the Australian Capital Territory has passed a law so far. The Protection of Public Participation Act 2008 (ACT) safeguards activities aimed at shaping public opinion or advancing initiatives related to matters of public concern. If a party initiates or continues legal proceedings against a defendant with an improper motive, they may be directed to pay a financial penalty to the Territory.
Characteristics of SLAPP suits
Characteristics of SLAPP suits may include:
Chilling Effect: SLAPP suits are intended to have a chilling effect on the defendant’s freedom of speech and public participation by creating a fear of legal consequences.
Lack of Merit: SLAPP suits may lack strong legal merit, and the plaintiff may not expect to prevail in court. Instead, the goal is to use the legal process as a tool for intimidation.
Timing: SLAPP suits are often filed in response to public statements or actions by the defendant, such as criticism of the plaintiff’s business practices or advocacy on a particular issue.
Financial Burden: The cost of legal defense in SLAPP suits can be significant, and the threat of financial strain is part of the strategy to deter the defendant.
Retraction or Apology: Sometimes, the plaintiff may drop the lawsuit if the defendant agrees to retract statements or issue an apology, further emphasizing the strategic nature of the legal action.
While SLAPP lawsuits can take various forms, here are a few examples to illustrate the concept:
Environmental Activism
- Scenario: A group of environmental activists campaigns against a large corporation for alleged environmental violations.
- SLAPP Lawsuit: The corporation files a lawsuit against the activists, claiming defamation and seeking damages. The real intention is to silence the activists and discourage them from further environmental advocacy.
Consumer Advocacy
- Scenario: A consumer group criticizes a company for its product safety practices and calls for a boycott.
- SLAPP Lawsuit: The company responds with a defamation lawsuit against the consumer group, arguing that their statements are false and damaging to the company’s reputation. The goal is to intimidate the consumer group into retracting their statements.
Development Project Opposition
- Scenario: Local residents and community groups oppose a major real estate development project due to concerns about its impact on the environment and local infrastructure.
- SLAPP Lawsuit: The developer files a lawsuit against the community groups, alleging interference with business interests and seeking monetary damages. The objective is to deter the opposition and allow the development to proceed without challenges.
Whistleblower Cases
- Scenario: An employee exposes corrupt practices within a government agency.
- SLAPP Lawsuit: The agency or implicated individuals file a lawsuit against the whistleblower, accusing them of making false claims or leaking confidential information. The aim is to silence the whistleblower and discourage others from coming forward with similar allegations.
Political Activism
- Scenario: A group of activists openly criticizes government policies and advocates for political change.
- SLAPP Lawsuit: The government or political figures file defamation lawsuits against the activists, alleging false statements and seeking damages. The intention is to quash dissent and opposition to the government’s agenda.
It’s important to note that in each of these examples, the lawsuits are not necessarily filed with the genuine belief that they will succeed on legal merits.
Instead, they are strategic tools used to deter and harass individuals or groups that express opinions or engage in activities perceived as threats to the interests of the party filing the lawsuit.
Related stories
See also: NSW Forestry Corp have a fight on their hands to Save Bulga Forest
Bulga Forest Defender In Forster Court
Lola Koala’s tree-sit in Bulga Forest continues a tradition of forest protest
Forest defenders and climate activists arrested in Bulga State Forest
Locals protest NSW Forestry logging in Bulga Forest
Knitting Nanna blocks saw mill & stops logging trucks
