No Wine, Coffee, or Chocolate – Is this the End of Civilisation?
Picture a world without wine, coffee, or chocolate. Civilizations have collapsed for less. The morning ritual reduced to tepid water; date nights downgraded to teary confessions over chamomile tea; and entire economies brought to their knees by the collective caffeine withdrawal of humankind.
The thought alone is enough to trigger global panic-buying. Yet this isn’t dystopian fiction—it’s a slow, creeping reality. These three luxuries that sweeten, stimulate, and soothe our lives are all quietly wilting under the weight of a changing climate.
Sure, we might adapt—scientists say humans are resilient—but let’s be honest: a planet deprived of Shiraz, espresso, and dark chocolate would test even the strongest survival instincts. Forget rising seas—this could be the end of life as we know it.
Advertisement:
The slow, simmering crisis facing wine, coffee, and chocolate may not make as much noise as melting ice sheets—but for billions of people, it’s far more personal. Each of these beloved crops is now a casualty of climate change, caught between rising heat, erratic rainfall, and the creeping march of pests and disease.
Once-stable harvests are faltering, and the terroirs that gave us the world’s most distinctive vintages, beans, and bars are shifting or disappearing altogether.
Failing Grapevines
Wine growers have long been the canaries in the climate coal mine. Grapevines are exquisitely sensitive to small changes in temperature and rainfall, and recent heatwaves across Europe, California, and Australia have caused grapes to ripen too quickly, throwing off the balance of sugar and acidity that defines fine wine.
A 2023 study predicts that traditional grape-growing regions could shrink by up to 62% by mid-century under a high-emissions scenario. Growers in Bordeaux and the Barossa are already experimenting with heat-tolerant varieties or moving to higher altitudes—but for many, there’s simply nowhere left to go.
The Last Coffee Bean
Coffee faces an even starker future. The world’s supply of Arabica—the high-quality bean behind your flat white—is expected to halve by 2050. Warming nights and unpredictable wet seasons are degrading both yield and flavour, while fungal diseases such as leaf rust thrive in the new climate reality.
Farmers from Colombia to Ethiopia have been forced upslope in search of cooler air, a temporary reprieve that comes at the cost of deforestation and soil erosion. Robusta coffee, grown in lower regions, isn’t faring much better, as it buckles under extreme heat and drought.
Advertisement:
Is It Too Late to Save Chocolate?
Then there’s cacao—the lifeblood of the world’s chocolate industry. West Africa, which produces more than 70% of global cacao, has seen back-to-back poor harvests. According to the International Cocoa Organization, production fell by around 14% in 2023–24, largely due to excessive rain, heat stress, and disease.
Trees that once thrived under humid forest canopies now struggle as rainfall patterns swing between deluge and drought. Smallholders—who supply most of the world’s beans—are watching decades of effort wither on the vine.
Together, these declines signal more than a luxury problem. They reveal how fragile our food systems are when confronted with a changing planet. Whether it’s the vineyards of Tuscany, the coffee highlands of Ethiopia, or the cacao forests of Ghana, the world’s indulgences—and the livelihoods tied to them—are becoming climate barometers.
The real question may no longer be whether we can afford to lose them, but whether we can afford not to change the way we treat the Earth.
Advertisement:
Will Geoengineering Save Agriculture?
A study published in Environmental Research Letters has cast doubt on whether even high-tech climate engineering can safeguard the future of the world’s favorite luxury crops — wine grapes, coffee, and cacao. These staples of both global culture and local economies are increasingly at the mercy of rising temperatures and erratic rainfall, leading to volatile harvests and shrinking farmer incomes.
The research team tested Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) — a proposed geoengineering technique that involves releasing reflective particles into the stratosphere to cool the planet, much like a volcanic eruption does naturally — to see if it could help stabilize growing conditions in 18 key production regions across western Europe, South America, and West Africa between 2036 and 2045.
The findings were sobering. While SAI successfully lowered surface temperatures, it failed to reliably recreate the delicate balance of temperature, rainfall, and humidity needed for these crops to thrive. Only six of the 18 regions studied showed consistent improvement compared with a non-SAI scenario. In most cases, unpredictable rainfall and humidity continued to undermine yields and revenue stability.
“Cooling alone isn’t the answer,” explained co-author Dr. Ariel Morrison. “Take cacao, for instance — it tolerates heat better than coffee or grapes, but is extremely vulnerable to pests and diseases triggered by high humidity and rainfall. Natural climate variability also plays a huge role; the same SAI scenario can still produce wildly different outcomes from one year to the next.”
Dr. Morrison added that while SAI might offer temporary regional relief, it is not a reliable fix for luxury-crop agriculture. “Real progress will come from locally tailored adaptation, investment in resilient farming practices, and international cooperation to protect these crops and the communities that depend on them.”
Study: Macroclimate growing conditions for luxury crops after stratospheric aerosol injection
Ariel L. Morrison*, Elizabeth A. Barnes, James W. Hurrell, and Daniel M. Hueholt
Published 4 November 2025 • Environmental Research Letters, Vol 20 No 11
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/adfbff
Opposition to Geoengineering
A growing chorus of scientists, environmentalists, and Indigenous leaders has voiced strong opposition to geoengineering schemes such as Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI). Their concerns go well beyond whether these interventions work—they question whether humanity should be attempting to re-engineer the planet’s climate system at all.
Critics warn that manipulating the atmosphere could create unintended consequences, disrupting weather patterns, altering rainfall in vulnerable regions, and even weakening political will to cut greenhouse gas emissions.
“Geoengineering risks becoming a moral hazard,” said one climate policy expert. “If governments and corporations view SAI as a quick technological fix, it could delay the urgent decarbonization efforts needed to address the root cause of climate change.”
The fear is that reliance on solar radiation management could lull policymakers into complacency, while the effects of sulphur aerosols or other reflective particles remain uncertain—potentially affecting everything from monsoon cycles to ozone recovery.
Opponents also highlight the ethical and governance challenges of SAI. Who gets to decide when, how, and where to deploy it? A single country or even a private actor could theoretically alter global climate patterns with consequences that cross borders.
Advertisement:
Climate Colonialism
The prospect of “climate colonialism”—where wealthy nations experiment with planetary-scale technologies that disproportionately impact poorer regions—has become a rallying cry for climate justice movements.
Indigenous communities, too, have called for a stronger voice in these discussions. They point out that traditional knowledge systems have maintained local climate balance for centuries through stewardship, not manipulation.
For many, SAI represents an extension of the same extractive mindset that caused the crisis in the first place.
While researchers continue to explore SAI as one of many potential tools, most agree it should never be seen as a substitute for emissions reduction and ecosystem restoration. As the new study makes clear, even the most advanced interventions cannot promise a stable future for crops—or the people—already living on the front lines of climate disruption.
Related stories
Proof that weather modification exists
The Best of Australian Wine: Halliday Wine Companion
Coffee Clash Victory: Vittoria Defeats Moccona
A damned fine cup of coffee in Paris – Bar L’Entrepot’s
V&A acquires Wedgwood tea & coffee set from Karl Lagerfeld
Ten best Brandy Cocktail recipes
French wine lovers love Montmartre Grape Harvest Festival
PR firms are spreading climate misinformation. Can we stop them?
Media jujutsu – strategy of media as a process to turn opponents’ own power against them
Media as resistance: Disrupting and shifting power.
Meet The Frackers: Santos Limited company information
Unmasking Greenwashing: ACCR Takes Santos to Federal Court
Meet the Frackers: Gas explorers in Australia
Advertisement:
