The Melbourne Rainforest Action Group has released a comprehensive article detailing Hancock Prospecting’s controversial activities in Ecuador since 2017. Through its wholly-owned subsidiary Hanrine, Hancock Prospecting has been exploring for copper and gold in eleven mining concessions in northwestern Ecuador.
The article, based on seven years of frontline reporting, documents numerous instances where Hanrine was allegedly involved in violent incidents, irregular judicial dealings, and civil rights violations.
According to Liz Downes, a campaigner for the Rainforest Action Group, “Hanrine’s alleged actions have included blockading access roads to communities, using the state police and military to force its workers and machinery through towns and villages, manipulating the Ecuadorian judiciary, trying to gain access to water sources reserved for agricultural use without following due process, and criminalising people who peacefully protest saying they don’t want mining on their properties.”
Lack of Oversight and Accountability
Downes also highlighted the lack of oversight and accountability for these actions, stating, “While many of these actions have been widely reported on Ecuadorian news media and social media, they have been allowed to continue to expand their projects with little oversight and a large degree of impunity.”
“Meanwhile, there is scant recourse for people in Ecuador (or anywhere overseas) to lodge complaints within Australia about impacts or violations caused by Australian mining companies,” Ms Downes said.
She further noted Australia’s significant role in the global metals mining industry, “Australia is already the world’s biggest metals mining jurisdiction, responsible for the production of around 40% of global metal resources in 2022. As demand for ‘critical’ minerals grows, Australian mining companies are exploring or developing projects across most continents.”
Downes expressed concerns about the broader impacts of this expansion, “This expansion is creating so-called sacrifice zones, where people and environments are plundered to serve corporate profits and geopolitical agendas.”
“While companies are keen to state how clean and green they are on their websites, the reality on the ground is often very different – and it is difficult to challenge the public narrative.”
In March and April 2024, Hancock Prospecting acquired five additional exploration concessions in a mega-biodiverse region in Ecuador known for its long-standing resistance to mining.
Additionally, the company invested $186 million in a copper exploration project in the southern part of the country.
For Gina Rinehart, the majority owner and chairman of Hancock Prospecting, these acquisitions are part of a broader strategy to invest in battery metals, including lithium and rare earth metals.
The Rainforest Action Group, a grassroots working group affiliated with the Rainforest Information Centre, was formed in 2018 to support the campaign to protect Ecuador’s megadiverse rainforests in the Amazon and Western Andes from extensive mining concessions.
Who is Gina Rinehart?
Gina Rinehart is an Australian mining magnate, businesswoman, and philanthropist. She is the chairman of Hancock Prospecting, a privately-owned mineral exploration and extraction company founded by her father, Lang Hancock.
Rinehart is Australia’s wealthiest person, with her fortune primarily derived from iron ore mining. Under her leadership, Hancock Prospecting has expanded significantly, making her a prominent figure in the global mining industry.
Some of Gina Rinehart’s Controversies
Family Disputes
- Legal Battles: Gina Rinehart has been involved in highly publicized legal disputes with her children over the control of a family trust, which holds a significant share of Hancock Prospecting. The litigation revealed deep family rifts and has drawn considerable media attention.
- Trust Fund Issues: Rinehart’s management of the family trust has been contested by her children, who have accused her of mismanagement and self-serving decisions.
Environmental Concerns
- Mining Practices: Rinehart’s mining operations have been criticized for their environmental impact, particularly in relation to land degradation, water usage, and biodiversity loss. Environmental groups have raised concerns about the sustainability and ecological footprint of her projects.
- Climate Change Stance: Rinehart has been criticized for her views on climate change. She has expressed skepticism about the human impact on climate change and has opposed regulations that would limit carbon emissions, aligning her with more conservative viewpoints on environmental policy.
Labor Relations
- Worker Conditions: Hancock Prospecting has faced scrutiny over working conditions in its mines. There have been allegations of inadequate safety measures, long working hours, and insufficient benefits for workers.
- Union Conflicts: Rinehart’s strong stance against labor unions and collective bargaining has led to conflicts with worker representatives. She has been accused of undermining workers’ rights to strengthen her company’s position.
Public Statements and Political Involvement
- Controversial Comments: Rinehart has made several public statements that have sparked controversy. For example, she once suggested that Australians should be willing to work for lower wages to compete with African workers, which was widely criticized.
- Political Donations: Rinehart has been an active political donor, particularly supporting conservative politicians and policies that favor the mining industry. Her political involvement has raised questions about the influence of wealthy individuals on public policy.
Tax and Royalties Disputes
- Tax Minimization: Rinehart and her companies have been accused of using aggressive tax minimization strategies. Critics argue that such practices deprive the Australian public of fair revenue from natural resources.
- Royalties Disputes: Hancock Prospecting has been involved in disputes over the payment of royalties to the Western Australian government and indigenous landowners, with allegations of underpayment and contractual breaches.
Gina Rinehart remains a polarizing figure in Australia, admired for her business acumen and success, yet frequently criticized for her approach to family, labor, environmental, and political issues.
Related stories
The Frackers: Senex, Gina Rinehart’s Hancock Energy & Posco
Meet the Frackers: Gina Rinehart & Lakes Blue Energy
Meet the Frackers: Gas explorers in Australia
Fracking incidents on cattle station in Beetaloo Basin NT
