COP29: Lofty Promises, Stark Realities, and a Call for Justice
The COP29 climate summit concluded in Baku, Azerbaijan, leaving behind a trail of frustration and unmet expectations. For two weeks, the world watched as high-income countries and a petrostate presidency navigated a precarious balancing act. The result? A climate finance agreement that critics say does little to address the pressing needs of low-income nations grappling with the escalating climate crisis.
A Hollow Victory for Climate Finance
Wealthy nations agreed to mobilize USD $300 billion annually by 2035 under the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) on climate finance. While the figure might sound substantial, activists and experts argue it pales in comparison to the $1.3 trillion per year demanded by countries on the front lines of the climate emergency. Oxfam Australia’s Policy and Advocacy Lead, Josie Lee, did not mince words:
“There will be no new money in this climate finance goal. Like the last goal, it allows wealthy countries who have caused the climate crisis to achieve the goal through rebadged aid budgets and non-concessional loans. It’s a shameful failure to take responsibility and to hold big polluting corporations accountable. This meaningless goal will push countries and communities that have done little to cause the climate breakdown into debt and greater hardship.”
The disappointment was shared across civil society organizations. Plan International Australia’s CEO, Susanne Legena, described the outcome as a “devastating” setback for equity and justice:
“Climate finance is not a luxury. It is a lifeline for communities facing the impact of the climate crisis. Girls and young women, particularly in the Pacific region, are disproportionately affected, with food insecurity, missed education, and increased risks of gender-based violence becoming the norm. This COP squandered the opportunity to address these injustices.”
Advertisement:
Falling Short on Adaptation and Loss and Damage
Perhaps the most glaring omission in the NCQG is the lack of concrete targets for adaptation and loss and damage—the very issues most critical to vulnerable nations. Erin Ryan, Senior International Campaigner at Climate Action Network Australia, highlighted the inadequacies:
“An annual finance goal of USD $300 billion might sound superficially like a large number, but when spread globally, it leaves us where we started: with low-income countries struggling to shoulder the rising costs of a climate crisis they never caused. Australia, as a wealthy nation and major fossil fuel exporter, notably failed to drive bigger ambition or listen to the voices of our Pacific neighbors.”
The Australian Government’s reluctance to champion loss and damage funding, a key demand from Pacific nations, has further strained relationships. For these communities, the stakes are existential: rising seas threaten to engulf entire nations, while extreme weather events continue to devastate livelihoods.
Gender and Intergenerational Justice Sidestepped
Plan International Australia sounded the alarm on the erosion of gender equity within the COP29 negotiations. Youth delegate Kupakwashe Matangira expressed frustration:
“Girls face the worst of the climate crisis, and we cannot risk leaving them behind. The NCQG outcome failed to embed principles of gender and intergenerational justice, leaving future generations unprotected and vulnerable.”
Despite these setbacks, young people’s advocacy provided a glimmer of hope. Delegates like Tegan Clark emphasized the critical role of youth in holding leaders accountable:
“It has been the young people on the ground at COP29 who have kept the fight for climate and gender justice alive. Our advocacy is unwavering, and we continue to challenge systems to provide hope for a fair and just future.”
Looking Ahead to COP30 in Brazil
As the world turns its gaze to COP30 in Brazil next year, the path forward remains fraught. Activists call for a more inclusive process that prioritizes frontline communities, indigenous voices, and bold solutions over corporate interests. Erin Ryan underscored the urgency:
“The COP process can be salvaged. We need to cut the self-interest and get back to why we’re here: to talk earnestly about a crisis that affects all of us. That means kicking out fossil fuel lobbyists, creating space for bold ideas, and keeping negotiators face-to-face with the realities of a runaway climate emergency.”
The challenge is clear: COP30 must deliver where COP29 faltered. Without transformative action, the world risks leaving its most vulnerable behind, while the clock on climate justice ticks ever louder.
Related stories
Can Trump Derail the Renewable Energy Movement?
LNG Exports Killed Australian Manufacturing
The Truth About Richard Denniss and The Australia Institute
CSIRO Reports 20% Increase in Methane Emissions Over 20 Years
What is “Net Zero” and How do we get there?
Advertisement:
