A new toxic chemical spill in Bass Strait has raised alarms about Esso’s ability to manage its aging oil and gas platforms, with the incident only coming to light after questions from Greens Senator Peter Whish-Wilson to the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA).
The spill, identified as methane condensate, mixes with water, dissolving and causing severe damage to marine life. NOPSEMA, the industry regulator, did not publicly disclose the spill until pressed by Senator Whish-Wilson, drawing criticism for its lack of transparency.
The news of the regulator keeping this disaster a secret comes on the same day that the Victorian Government has approved new gas exploration just a few kilometres from the iconic Twelve Apostles.
Advertisement:
This incident marks the second toxic spill in Bass Strait, further highlighting concerns about the regulator’s ability to ensure environmental safety.
Jeff Waters, Offshore Fossil Gas Campaigner for Friends of the Earth (FoE), expressed anger over NOPSEMA’s secrecy and Esso’s inadequate cleanup proposals.
“First of all, this is yet another example of how NOPSEMA is incapable of ensuring environmental safety in the offshore gas industry,” Waters said. “It shows how cozy they are with industry that they wouldn’t let anybody know this toxic spill had happened.”
Waters also criticized Esso’s plans to decommission its platforms, which involve dumping large amounts of steel into Bass Strait and disposing of waste near a Ramsar-listed wetland at Corner Inlet.
“They want to save as much money as possible by doing it all quickly in one season, rather than taking time and shipping all of the waste to an empty brownfield site in the Port of Geelong, which Esso discounted because it would cost more,” Waters explained.
“Given the fact they can’t stop spills at sea while these rusting hulks are still stationary, one can only imagine the scale of the environmental disaster we are about to witness in and off Gippsland,” Waters added.
He emphasized that Esso’s rushed and cost-cutting decommissioning plans are likely to cause an ecological catastrophe.
Friends of the Earth has initiated a petition to halt Esso’s decommissioning plans before they are approved. The petition can be signed at Recycle the Rigs.
The latest spill is a stark reminder of the potential for significant environmental damage and the urgent need for stricter oversight and more responsible decommissioning practices.
Aging Oil and Gas Platforms Leaking into the Ocean
When we think of ocean pollution, images of plastic waste and oil spills often come to mind. However, there’s a less visible but equally insidious threat lurking beneath the waves: aging oil and gas platforms.
These rusting giants, once heralded as marvels of engineering and sources of economic prosperity, are now potential ecological disasters waiting to happen.
The Hidden Dangers of Decrepit Platforms
Oil and gas platforms are complex structures, designed to extract valuable resources from beneath the ocean floor. Over the decades, many of these platforms have reached or exceeded their intended lifespans.
As they age, the risk of structural failures and leaks increases, posing severe threats to marine environments.
Recent events have highlighted just how critical this issue is. In Bass Strait, for example, Esso’s aging platforms have been at the center of controversy due to repeated toxic chemical spills.
The most recent incident involved a spill of methane condensate, a harmful substance that mixes with water and can have catastrophic effects on sea life.
This spill, kept secret by the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA) until exposed by probing questions, underscores the pressing need for greater transparency and accountability in the offshore oil and gas industry.
The Environmental Impact
The environmental repercussions of leaks from aging platforms are profound. Methane condensate, for instance, is particularly insidious because it doesn’t form a visible slick on the water’s surface. Instead, it dissolves, affecting marine life over a wide area.
Methane itself is a potent greenhouse gas, significantly more damaging to the climate than carbon dioxide over a short period.
Marine ecosystems are delicate and intricately balanced. Toxic spills can decimate fish populations, damage coral reefs, and harm the broader food web, including species that are crucial for commercial and recreational fishing.
The cumulative impact of multiple spills can lead to long-term ecological degradation that may take decades to repair.
Regulatory Failures and Industry Responsibility
One of the most alarming aspects of these incidents is the apparent regulatory failure. NOPSEMA’s reluctance to disclose the recent spill until prompted by external inquiry raises serious concerns about the industry’s oversight.
Environmental groups argue that this cozy relationship between regulators and the oil and gas industry compromises the safety and health of our oceans.
Jeff Waters, a campaigner with Friends of the Earth, has been vocal about the need for more stringent regulations and responsible decommissioning practices.
He criticizes current proposals by companies like Esso, which plan to dispose of vast amounts of potentially recyclable steel and other waste materials quickly and cheaply, rather than taking the time to minimize environmental harm.
The Call for Action
As these platforms continue to age, the risk of further leaks and spills looms large. It’s imperative that we address this issue head-on:
Stricter Oversight: Regulatory bodies like NOPSEMA must enforce stricter oversight and transparency, ensuring that all spills and leaks are promptly reported and addressed.
Responsible Decommissioning: Oil and gas companies must prioritize environmentally responsible decommissioning practices. This includes recycling materials where possible and avoiding shortcuts that put ecosystems at risk.
Public Awareness and Advocacy: Public awareness and advocacy are crucial. Organizations like Friends of the Earth play a vital role in holding both the industry and regulators accountable. Supporting their efforts through petitions and public campaigns can help drive change.
Transition to Sustainable Energy: Ultimately, reducing our reliance on fossil fuels and transitioning to sustainable energy sources is the most effective long-term solution. Investments in renewable energy will mitigate the need for new oil and gas projects, reducing the overall environmental footprint.
Silent Threat Beneath the Waves
The silent threat of aging oil and gas platforms leaking into the ocean is a pressing environmental issue that demands immediate action. As we continue to push for greater transparency, stricter regulations, and responsible industry practices, we must also look towards a future where renewable energy sources take precedence.
Our oceans are vital to the health of our planet and our heritage; protecting them is a responsibility we all share.
For those looking to take action, consider supporting environmental groups, staying informed about local and global offshore drilling activities, and advocating for sustainable energy policies.
Together, we can ensure a safer, cleaner future for our oceans and the countless species that call them home.
Related stories
Victoria’s Offshore Gas Drilling Approval Condemned
NT Govt Signs Deal for Unapproved Fracking Project
Emissions wildly underestimated from fracking in NT
Fracking incidents on cattle station in Beetaloo Basin NT
UN Secretary-General Calls for Fossil Fuel Advertising Ban
Meet the Frackers: Origin Energy ASX:ORG company information
Santos accused of misleading advertising
Global Methane Pledge: UN launch methane detection satellite
Net Zero+ International Programme for Action on Climate
Climate of the Nation Report: Australia Climate Research
Carbon Credits Used to Plug Orphan Oil & Gas Wells
Best way to reduce climate change is stop gas industry methane leaks
What is Greenwashing and How to spot it
How the Queensland Government fracked the state
Meet the Frackers: Gas explorers in Australia